首页> 外文会议>2017 7th World Engineering Education Forum >The Effects of Infusion Approach in Engineering Drawing to the Critical Thinking Dispositions Among Technical Students
【24h】

The Effects of Infusion Approach in Engineering Drawing to the Critical Thinking Dispositions Among Technical Students

机译:工程制图中注入方法对技术学生批判性思维倾向的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Teaching engineering drawings that focus only on the mastery of concepts and techniques without training students to manipulate and integrate the concepts and techniques learned preventing the application of critical thinking through this subject. Therefore, a study that determines the teaching method in applying and cultivating critical thinking disposition its effect is required. The two teaching approaches used were the conventional approach for the control group and the compounding approach for the treatment group. A quasi-experimental study with a nonequivalent control group design was carried out for 8 weeks on study groups selected from two different Technical Matriculation Colleges. A total of 31 students were selected for the control group and a total of 29 students were chosen for the treatment group in the sample study. A pretest, followed by an intervention for 8 weeks were carried out. After the intervention, a posttest was carried out on the control and treatment groups. The results of the pretest and posttest of the control group and treatment group were then compared and evaluated. Three instruments was used in the pretest and posttest is Malaysia Critical Thinking Instrument (MACTI). The pretest showed that there was no significant difference in the critical thinking dispositions of the control and treatment groups. However, the results of the posttest showed that the critical thinking dispositions of the treatment group were significantly higher than the control group.
机译:教学工程图仅专注于概念和技术的掌握,而没有培训学生操纵和整合所学的概念和技术,从而防止通过该学科应用批判性思维。因此,需要进行一项研究来确定应用和培养批判性思维处置其效果的教学方法。所使用的两种教学方法是对照组的常规方法和治疗组的复方方法。对来自两个不同的技术预科学院的研究组进行了为期8周的准实验研究,其中对照组的设计不相同。在样本研究中,共选择了31名学生作为对照组,并选择了29名学生作为治疗组。进行了预测试,然后进行了8周的干预。干预后,对对照组和治疗组进行后测。然后比较和评估对照组和治疗组的前测和后测结果。前测和后测使用了三种工具:马来西亚批判性思维工具(MACTI)。预测试表明,对照组和治疗组的批判性思维倾向没有显着差异。但是,后测结果表明,治疗组的批判性思维倾向明显高于对照组。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号