首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Jun 23-28, 2002, Oslo, Norway >EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF LEAK-BEFORE-BREAK (LBB) BEHAVIOR FOR HIGH-GRADE LINE PIPES WITH AN AXIAL THROUGH-WALL FLAW
【24h】

EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF LEAK-BEFORE-BREAK (LBB) BEHAVIOR FOR HIGH-GRADE LINE PIPES WITH AN AXIAL THROUGH-WALL FLAW

机译:带轴向穿墙弹跳的高等级管道的泄漏前破坏(LBB)行为的实验评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Leak-before-break (LBB) behavior was evaluated for two series of conventional line pipes (X65) and three series of high-grade line pipes (X80) with various fracture toughness value. Full-scale hydrostatic burst tests were conducted for the line pipes with an axial through-wall flaw to determine hoop stress for LBB. The experimental results were then compared to the estimation using a Charpy V-notched impact energy (CVN) -based equation by Battelle. The present study clarified that the CVN-based equation was applicable to the pipes with CVN energy less than 130 J. On the contrary, the equation was not applicable to the pipes with CVN energy grater than 130 J. The results of instrumented Charpy tests showed that the load versus load-point displacement response for the high CVN energy pipes was different from that for the low CVN energy pipes. Therefore, the applicability of the CVN-based equation was dependent on the load versus load-point displacement response. This result suggested that the CVN-based equation should be modified to evaluate the LBB criterion for the pipes with relatively high toughness.
机译:对两个系列的传统管线管(X65)和三个系列的各种断裂韧性值的高级管线管(X80)评估了断裂前泄漏(LBB)行为。对具有轴向通孔缺陷的管线进行了全面的静液压爆破测试,以确定LBB的环向应力。然后将实验结果与由Battelle使用基于夏比V型缺口冲击能(CVN)的方程式与估算值进行比较。本研究澄清了基于CVN的方程式适用于CVN能量小于130 J的管道。相反,该方程式不适用于CVN能量大于130 J的管道。仪器化的夏比测试结果表明高CVN能量管的负载与负载点位移响应不同。因此,基于CVN的方程式的适用性取决于载荷与载荷点位移响应。该结果表明,应修改基于CVN的方程式,以评估具有较高韧性的管道的LBB标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号