首页> 外文学位 >Real options and the management of R&D investment: An analysis of comparative advantage, market structure, and industry dynamics in biotechnology.
【24h】

Real options and the management of R&D investment: An analysis of comparative advantage, market structure, and industry dynamics in biotechnology.

机译:实物期权和研发投资管理:生物技术的比较优势,市场结构和行业动态分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study examines the US comparative advantage in biotechnology vis-a-vis other Northern countries, and the pattern of biotechnology industry dynamics emerging from the early entry of start-ups and the lagged entry of multinationals. The development of high technology industries like biotechnology is heavily influenced by the R&D investment behavior of firms active in the industry. Many theoretical treatments of R&D investment tend to be excessively stylized, emphasizing the outcome, rather than the process, of investment. In doing so, they neglect key characteristics of biotechnology R&D investment.; In contrast, real options theory represents investment as a dynamic process, extending over multiple time periods, and continuously impacted by evolving conditions in the stochastic investment environment. Real options incorporate the principle that firms actively manage their investments, adapting investment strategies in response to the gradual resolution of ongoing uncertainty surrounding the investment. This corresponds to the general structure of biotechnology R&D investment.; A real options model of investment with uncertain cost was used to analyze the source of the US comparative advantage in biotechnology vis-a-vis Europe, its closest rival. Empirical evidence suggests two sources of heterogeneity in the biotechnology R&D process: US biotechnology firms, on average, invest in R&D at a faster per-period rate, and face a less uncertain domestic regulatory regime, than European biotechnology firms. This leads to a cross-country asymmetry in strategies for managing the option to invest in biotechnology R&D: more specifically, US firms impose a less rigorous decision criterion, vis-a-vis European firms, to evaluate and manage their biotechnology R&D investment opportunities.; Computer simulation was used to examine the implications of this result for the average R&D investment behavior of representative US and European biotechnology firms. The simulation results suggest that, on average, US biotechnology firms initiate more R&D projects, commence investment sooner, innovate more rapidly, persevere longer in the face of mounting R&D costs, are less selective about potential projects based on expected return, and ultimately, successfully complete more projects, than their European counterparts. This supplies a plausible explanation for the emergence of the US as the world leader in biotechnology, relative to other Northern countries, based on the key insight that the US comparative advantage lies within the structure of the economic process central to leadership in high technology industries: the ability to create, develop, and commercialize new technologies. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)
机译:这项研究考察了美国在生物技术上相对于其他北方国家的比较优势,以及新兴企业的早期进入和跨国公司的滞后带来的生物技术产业动态格局。生物技术等高科技产业的发展在很大程度上受到活跃于该产业的公司的R&D投资行为的影响。 R&D投资的许多理论处理都趋于过分程式化,强调投资的结果而非过程。在这样做时,他们忽略了生物技术研发投资的关键特征。相比之下,实物期权理论将投资表示为一个动态过程,它跨越多个时间段,并受到随机投资环境中不断变化的条件的不断影响。实物期权包含以下原则:公司积极管理其投资,根据逐步解决围绕投资的不确定性而调整投资策略。这与生物技术研发投资的总体结构相对应。使用具有不确定成本的实物期权投资模型来分析美国在生物技术方面相对于其最接近的竞争对手欧洲的比较优势的来源。经验证据表明,生物技术研发过程中存在两种异质性来源:与欧洲生物技术公司相比,美国生物技术公司平均以更快的周期投资于研发,并且面临的国内监管制度的不确定性较小。这导致在管理生物技术研发投资选择权的策略上出现跨国不对称现象:更具体地说,相对于欧洲公司,美国公司施加了较不严格的决策标准来评估和管理其生物技术研发投资机会。 ;使用计算机仿真来检验该结果对美国和欧洲代表性生物技术公司的平均R&D投资行为的影响。模拟结果表明,平均而言,美国生物技术公司启动更多的研发项目,更快地开始投资,创新更快,面对不断增加的研发成本而坚持更长的时间,对基于预期收益的潜在项目的选择较少,最终最终成功完成了比欧洲同行更多的项目。相对于其他北方国家,这为美国崛起为生物技术的全球领导者提供了一个合理的解释,这是基于以下关键见解:美国的比较优势在于对高科技产业领导地位至关重要的经济过程结构内:具有创建,开发和商业化新技术的能力。 (摘要由UMI缩短。)

著录项

  • 作者

    Lavoie, Brian F.;

  • 作者单位

    The Ohio State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Ohio State University.;
  • 学科 Agriculture Food Science and Technology.; Economics Agricultural.; Economics Theory.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 215 p.
  • 总页数 215
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 农产品收获、加工及贮藏;农业经济;经济学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号