首页> 外文学位 >NAMELESS THINGS AND THINGLESS NAMES: AN ESSAY ON POSTMODERN FANTASY.
【24h】

NAMELESS THINGS AND THINGLESS NAMES: AN ESSAY ON POSTMODERN FANTASY.

机译:无名字和无名字:关于后现代幻想的论述。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

While many writers still perform comfortably in the Balzacian and modernist modes of fiction, clearly since about the nineteen forties another impulse has surfaced along side these projects. Whether as a shorthand for a system of concerns we call this mode of perception postmodernism, or conjure up a less loaded term--perhaps Hassan's Age of Indetermanence, or something else, Absurdism, Uncertainism, The Age of Silence--we find a new cluster of obsessions arises, a certain fixation with exhaustion, degree zero, the dehuman, perversion of cultural norms, a belief in The End, decreation, signifer rather than signified, hyper self-reflexivity, and so on. Since this new impulse arose in response to a universe under physical and metaphysical erasure, and since it tries to come to terms with a situation it believes fantastic, there is little wonder that the mode of discourse chosen as a vehicle for its consciousness is the fantastic.Postmodern fantasy, as we discover in the projects of Kafka, Borges, Robbe-Grillet, Beckett, Fuentes, Pynchon, Garc(')ia Marquez and Coetzee, is the literary equivalent of deconstructionism, for it interrogates all we take for granted about language and experience, giving these no more than shifting and provisional status. It may be seen as a mode of radical skepticism that believes only in the impossibility of total intelligibility in the endless displacement of "meaning" in the jamming of conceptual closure in the production of a universe without fault, "truth," origin in a bottomless relativity of "significance."Fantasy is a metagenre that touches upon romance, fairy tales, folklore, myth, legend, science fiction, satire, utopia, dystopia, detective stories, allegory, dream visions, surrealist fictions, tales of horror, and so forth. It is a mode of discourse, as Todorov points out, that stutters between two other modes, the marvelous and the mimetic, thereby confusing them and generating a dialectic that refuses synthesis it explores the unsaid and unseen in a culture, rejects any definitive version of "reality." As a result, its function is to surprise, question, put into doubt, produce anxiety, make active, repel, rebel, subvert, make ambiguous, dislocate, destabilize.
机译:尽管许多作家仍然在巴尔扎契式和现代主义小说模式中表现得舒心,但显然自大约19世纪40年代以来,在这些项目旁边又出现了另一种冲动。无论是作为关注系统的简写,我们将这种感知模式称为后现代主义,还是构想出一个负载较小的术语(例如哈桑的独立时代,或荒诞主义,不确定性,沉默时代),我们都会找到新的出现了成群的执着,某种精疲力尽,零度,不人道,对文化规范的歪曲,对《末日》的信仰,贬低,标志性而非标志性,超自我反省等等。由于这种新的冲动是对物理和形而上学擦除下的宇宙的反应而产生的,并且由于它试图与它认为是奇妙的情况相适应,因此毫不奇怪,话语模式被选为其意识的载体是奇妙的正如我们在卡夫卡(Kafka),博尔赫斯(Borges),罗伯·格里莱特(Robbe-Grillet),贝克特(Bettett),富恩特斯(Fuentes),皮钦(Pynchon),加尔·马克斯(Garc(')ia Marquez)和库切(Coetzee)的项目中发现的那样,后现代幻想在文学上等同于解构主义,因为它质疑我们所认为的一切语言和经验,给他们的不仅仅是转移和临时的地位。可以将其视为激进怀疑论的一种模式,这种模式仅相信不可能完全无误地理解“意义”的无休止位移,而无法产生无误的宇宙“真相”,即无意义的宇宙产生中的概念封闭。幻想是一个涉及浪漫,童话,民间传说,神话,传说,科幻小说,讽刺小说,乌托邦,反乌托邦,侦探小说,寓言,梦境,超现实主义小说,恐怖故事等的元类型。向前。正如托多罗夫指出的那样,这是一种话语模式,在另两种模式(奇妙的和模仿的)之间结结巴巴,从而使它们混淆,并产生了一种拒绝综合的辩证法,它探索了一种文化中未说过的和看不见的,拒绝了任何明确的版本。 “现实。”结果,它的作用是使人感到惊讶,质疑,怀疑,产生焦虑,积极主动,排斥,反抗,颠覆,使模棱两可,脱臼,破坏稳定。

著录项

  • 作者

    OLSEN, LANCE MARTIN.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Virginia.;

  • 授予单位 University of Virginia.;
  • 学科 Literature Comparative.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1985
  • 页码 238 p.
  • 总页数 238
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号