...
首页> 外文期刊>Gut and Liver >Factors Contributing to the Preference of Korean Patients with Crohn’s Disease When Selecting an Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Agent (CHOICE Study)
【24h】

Factors Contributing to the Preference of Korean Patients with Crohn’s Disease When Selecting an Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Agent (CHOICE Study)

机译:选择抗肿瘤坏死因子药物时,韩国克罗恩病患者偏爱的因素(选择研究)

获取原文
           

摘要

Background/AimsTwo comparable anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents with different routes of administration (intravenous [iv] infliximab [IFX] vs subcutaneous [sc] adalimumab [ADA]) are available for patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) in Korea. This study aimed to identify the preferences of Korean CD patients for a specific anti-TNF agent and the factors contributing to the decision.MethodsA prospective survey was performed among anti-TNF-naive CD patients in 10 tertiary referral hospitals. A 16-item questionnaire addressed patient preferences and the factors contributing to the decision in favor of a particular anti-TNF agent. A logistic regression was conducted to assess predictive factors for ADA preference.ResultsOverall, 189 patients (139 males; mean age, 32.47±11.71 years) completed the questionnaire. IFX and ADA were preferred by 63.5% (120/189) and 36.5% (69/189) of patients, respectively. The most influential reason for choosing IFX was ‘doctor’s presence’ (68.3%, 82/120), and ADA was “easy to use” (34.8%, 24/69). Amid various clinicodemographic data, having a >60-minute travel time to the hospital was a significant independent predictive factor for ADA preference.ConclusionsA large number of anti-TNF-naive Korean patients with CD preferred anti-TNFs with an iv route of administration. The reassuring effect of a doctor’s presence might be the main contributing factor for this decision.
机译:背景/目的在韩国患有克罗恩氏病(CD)的患者可以使用两种可比较的具有不同给药途径的抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)药物(静脉[iv]英夫利昔单抗[IFX]与皮下[sc]阿达木单抗[ADA])。这项研究旨在确定韩国CD患者对特定抗TNF药物的偏爱及其决定因素。方法在10所三级转诊医院中,对未接受TNF治疗的CD患者进行了前瞻性调查。一份16项问卷调查了患者的偏爱以及决定采用特定抗TNF药物的因素。进行Logistic回归分析以评估ADA偏爱的预测因素。结果总共189例患者(男性139例;平均年龄32.47±11.71岁)完成了问卷。 63.5%(120/189)和36.5%(69/189)的患者分别首选IFX和ADA。选择IFX的最有影响力的原因是“医生在场”(68.3%,82/120),而ADA是“易于使用”(34.8%,24/69)。在各种各样的临床电描记数据中,到医院的路程时间> 60分钟是ADA偏爱的重要独立预测因素。结论许多抗TNF初治的韩国CD患者首选静脉给药的抗TNF。医生在场的令人放心的影响可能是做出此决定的主要因素。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号