...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics >Bilateral and multilateral coauthorship and citation impact: patterns in UK and US international collaboration
【24h】

Bilateral and multilateral coauthorship and citation impact: patterns in UK and US international collaboration

机译:双边和多边共同作者和引文影响:英美国际合作的模式

获取原文
           

摘要

International collaboration makes up an increasing, high citation-impact share of research output, but the UK’s collaboration with key partners is threatened by its decision to leave the EU. Data show that about 85% of US and UK international collaboration is with only one or two partners, usually among other ‘leading’ research economies. Although highly multi-national research (10 or more authors) is growing more rapidly than total research output, it actually remains scarce (about 1% of all collaboration) among the established research economies. Analysis also shows that the ‘citation bonus’ contributed by international collaboration is in fact both specific and limited; it should therefore be interpreted with some care. For example, citation impact trends look different for two-country and multi-country collaborations involving the same countries. Impact also increases but then plateaus with increasing numbers of partners. Further, we find that massively multi-national papers are of such a different kind that we suggest they should be excluded from standard citation analysis.
机译:国际合作在研究成果中的引文影响力越来越高,但英国与主要合作伙伴的合作受到退出欧盟的威胁。数据显示,在美国和英国的国际合作中,约有85%仅与一个或两个合作伙伴(通常是其他“领先”研究经济体)合作。尽管高度跨国的研究(10名或以上的作者)的增长速度超过了总研究成果的增长速度,但在已建立的研究经济体中,它实际上仍然很少(约占所有合作的1%)。分析还表明,国际合作提供的“引文奖励”实际上既具体又有限。因此,应谨慎解释。例如,对于涉及同一国家的两个国家或多个国家的合作,引文影响趋势看起来有所不同。影响也有所增加,但随后随着合作伙伴数量的增加而达到稳定。此外,我们发现大型跨国论文的类型不同,因此建议将其排除在标准引文分析之外。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号