...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics >A Global Comparison of Scientific Mobility and Collaboration According to National Scientific Capacities
【24h】

A Global Comparison of Scientific Mobility and Collaboration According to National Scientific Capacities

机译:根据国家科学能力进行的科学流动与合作的全球比较

获取原文
           

摘要

This study compares the flows of mobile researchers and the number of publications in international collaboration within the context of scientific and economic capacities. The goal is to identify the convergence or discrepancy of countries in mobility and collaboration and determine the positions and relative influence of countries in both processes. Using affiliation data from scientific publications, we analyze the distributions and networks of collaboration and mobility and their structural differences. The results show that there is a significant relationship between the flow of mobile researchers and the capacity for publishing with foreign partners in the more prolific countries, although mobility is always lower than collaboration. Size matters and scientific relationship are highly resource-dependent. The Advanced and Proficient countries accumulate the highest proportion of the mobile authors and international publications with an extremely low representation of mobility in Developing and Lagging countries. In addition, the placement of countries is not always consistent in both networks, revealing the distinct roles, with particular instability for lower income countries. The more resources available in a country (both scientific and economic) the greater the likelihood of attracting foreign partners and mobilizing human capital. The policy relevance of these structural differences are described and a brief description of the limitations and future research are provided.
机译:这项研究在科学和经济能力的背景下比较了流动研究人员的流动和国际合作中的出版物数量。目的是查明各国在调动与合作中的趋同或差异,并确定各国在这两个进程中的地位和相对影响。利用来自科学出版物的隶属关系数据,我们分析了协作与流动性的分布和网络及其结构差异。结果表明,尽管流动性始终低于协作水平,但流动研究人员的流动与在多产国家中与外国合作伙伴的出版能力之间存在显着的关系。规模问题和科学关系高度依赖资源。先进和熟练国家在移动作者和国际出版物中所占的比例最高,而在发展中国家和落后国家中流动性的代表则非常低。此外,两个网络中国家的位置并不总是一致的,这揭示了不同的作用,对于低收入国家尤其不稳定。一个国家(科学和经济)可用的资源越多,吸引外国合作伙伴和动员人力资本的可能性就越大。描述了这些结构差异的政策相关性,并简要介绍了局限性和未来的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号