...
首页> 外文期刊>Gut and Liver >Efficacy and Safety of Rebamipide versus Its New Formulation, AD-203, in Patients with Erosive Gastritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Noninferiority, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study
【24h】

Efficacy and Safety of Rebamipide versus Its New Formulation, AD-203, in Patients with Erosive Gastritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Noninferiority, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study

机译:重生的疗效和安全性与其新配方,AD-203,患者患者腐蚀性胃炎:随机,双盲,活性控制,非闭合性,多中心,第3期研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background/Aims: The mucoprotective drug rebamipide is used to treat gastritis and peptic ulcers. We compared the efficacy of Mucosta ? (rebamipide 100 mg) and its new formulation, AD- 203 (rebamipide 150 mg), in treating erosive gastritis. Methods: This double-blind, active control, noninferiority, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial randomly assigned 475 patients with endoscopically proven erosive gastritis to two groups: AD-203 twice daily or Mucosta ? thrice daily for 2 weeks. The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis included 454 patients (AD-203, n=229; Mucosta ? , n=225), and the per-protocol (PP) analysis included 439 patients (AD- 203, n=224; Mucosta ? , n=215). The posttreatment assessments included the primary (erosion im- provement rate) and secondary endpoints (erosion and edema cure rates; improvement rates of red- ness, hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal symptoms). Drug-related adverse events were evaluated. Results: According to the ITT analysis, the erosion improvement rates (posttreatment) in AD- 203-treated and Mucosta ? -treated patients were 39.7% and 43.8%, respectively. According to the PP analysis, the erosion improvement rates (posttreatment) in AD-203-treated and Mucosta ? - treated patients were 39.3% and 43.7%, respectively. The one-sided 97.5% lower limit for the improvement rate difference between the study groups was ?4.01% (95% confidence interval [CI], –13.09% to 5.06%) in the ITT analysis and ?4.44% (95% CI, –13.65% to 4.78%) in the PP analysis. The groups did not significantly differ in the secondary endpoints in either analysis. Twenty-four AD-203-treated and 20 Mucosta ? -treated patients reported adverse events but no serious adverse drug reactions; both groups presented similar adverse event rates. Conclusions: The new formulation of rebamipide 150 mg (AD-203) twice daily was not inferior to rebamipide 100 mg (Mucosta ? ) thrice daily. Both formulations showed a similar efficacy in treat- ing erosive gastritis.
机译:背景/目的:粘液药物重生用于治疗胃炎和消化溃疡。我们比较了粘膜的功效? (重新划分100 mg)及其新的配方,Ad-203(refamipide 150 mg),治疗糜烂性胃炎。方法:这种双盲,活性控制,非流体,多中心,第3期临床试验随机分配475名内窥镜验证的糜烂性胃炎患者两组:每日两次或黏膜症两次吗?每天三个星期。意图治疗(ITT)分析包括454名患者(ad-203,n = 229;粘膜膜?,n = 225),并且每种方案(pp)分析包括439名患者(Ad-203,n = 224 ;粘膜?,n = 215)。后病理评估包括主要(侵蚀IM-探净率)和次要终点(侵蚀和水肿治疗率;改善红肿,出血和胃肠症状)。评估药物相关的不良事件。结果:根据ITT分析,侵蚀改善率(后处理)在Ad-203治疗和粘液中? - 治疗的患者分别为39.7%和43.8%。根据PP分析,AD-203治疗和粘膜中的侵蚀改善率(后处理)? - 治疗患者分别为39.3%和43.7%。在ITT分析中,研究组之间改善率差异的单面97.5%的限制下限为4.01%(置信区间隔95%,-13.09%至5.06%)和?4.44%(95%CI, PP分析中-13.65%至4.78%)。在两种分析中,该组在次要终点中没有显着差异。二十四个ad-203治疗和20爪子? - 治疗的患者报告不良事件,但没有严重的药物反应;两组均呈现出类似的不良事件率。结论:每天两次肾棕榈ide150mg(Ad-203)的新配方并不低于每日三米蛋白(黏膜)100毫克(黏膜)。两种配方在治疗腐蚀性胃炎中表现出类似的疗效。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号