...
首页> 外文期刊>Gut and Liver >Is a Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker Truly Superior to Proton Pump Inhibitors in Terms of Helicobacter pylori Eradication?
【24h】

Is a Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker Truly Superior to Proton Pump Inhibitors in Terms of Helicobacter pylori Eradication?

机译:是钾竞争性酸性阻滞剂,真正优于质子泵抑制剂,在<斜体切换=“是”>幽门螺杆菌 - 幽门螺杆菌根除?

获取原文
           

摘要

Vonoprazan (VPZ), a new potassium-competitive acid blocker, has been approved and used for Helicobacter pylori eradication in Japan. To date, many studies, as well as several systematic reviews and meta-analyses (MAs), have compared VPZ-based 7-day triple therapy with proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based therapy. An MA of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing first-line VPZ- with PPI-based triple therapy, the latter featuring amoxicillin (AMPC) and clarithro- mycin (CAM), found that approximately 30% of patients hosted CAM-resistant H. pylori ; however, the reliability was poor because of high heterogeneity and a risk of selection bias. VPZ-based triple therapy is superior to PPI-based triple therapy for patients with CAM-resistant H. pylori , but not for those with CAM-susceptible H. pylori . An MA of non-RCTs found that second-line VPZ- based triple therapies were slightly (~2.6%) better than PPI-based triple therapies (with AMPC and metronidazole). However, the reliability of that MA was also low because of selection bias, confounding variables and a risk of publication bias; in addition, it is difficult to generalize the results because of a lack of data on antibiotic resistance. VPZ-based triple therapy (involving AMPC and sitafloxacin) was more effective than PPI-based triple therapy in a third-line setting, but a confirmatory RCT is needed. Non-RCT studies indicated that VPZ-based triple therapy involving CAM and metronidazole may be promising. Any further RCTs must explore the antibi- otic-resistance status when evaluating the possible superiority of a potassium-competitive acid blocker.
机译:vonoprazan(vpz)是一种新的耐钾竞争性酸阻滞剂,已被批准并用于日本的幽门螺杆菌根除幽门螺杆菌。迄今为止,许多研究以及若干系统评价和荟萃分析(MAS),将基于VPZ的7天三重治疗与质子泵抑制剂(PPI)进行了比较了比较。随机对照试验(RCT)的MA与基于PPI的三重疗法比较,后者具有Amoxicillin(AMPC)和克拉霉素(CAM)的后者,发现大约30%的患者患者抵抗H.幽门;然而,由于高异质性和选择偏差的风险,可靠性差。基于VPZ的三重疗法优于基于PPI的三重治疗,适用于抗凸轮幽门螺杆菌的患者,但不适用于具有CAM易感H. Pylori的幽门螺杆菌。非RCT的MA发现,基于第二线VPZ的三疗法略微(〜2.6%)比基于PPI的三重疗法更好(用AMPC和甲硝唑)。然而,由于选择偏差,混淆变量以及出版物偏见的风险,因此MA的可靠性也很低;此外,由于缺乏关于抗生素抗性的数据,难以概括结果。基于VPZ的三重治疗(涉及AMPC和SitaFloxacin)比在第三线设置中的基于PPI的三重治疗更有效,但需要确认的RCT。非RCT研究表明,涉及凸轮和甲硝唑的基于VPZ的三重治疗可能是有前途的。在评估钾竞争性酸阻滞剂的可能优势时,任何其他RCT必须探讨抗性抗性状态。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号