...
首页> 外文期刊>ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing >Utility of remote sensing-based surface energy balance models to track water stress in rain-fed switchgrass under dry and wet conditions
【24h】

Utility of remote sensing-based surface energy balance models to track water stress in rain-fed switchgrass under dry and wet conditions

机译:基于遥感的表面能平衡模型在干燥和潮湿条件下追踪雨养柳枝water中的水分胁迫的效用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The ability of remote sensing-based surface energy balance (SEB) models to track water stress in rain-fed switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) has not been explored yet. In this paper, the theoretical framework of crop water stress index (CWSI; 0 = extremely wet or no water stress condition and 1 = extremely dry or no transpiration) was utilized to estimate CWSI in rain-fed switchgrass using Landsat-derived evapotranspiration (ET) from five remote sensing based single-source SEB models, namely Surface Energy Balance Algorithm for Land (SEBAL), Mapping ET with Internalized Calibration (METRIC), Surface Energy Balance System (SEBS), Simplified Surface Energy Balance Index (S-SEBI), and Operational Simplified Surface Energy Balance (SSEBop). CWSI estimates from the five SEB models and a simple regression model that used normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), near-surface temperature difference, and measured soil moisture (SM) as covariates were compared with those derived from eddy covariance measured ET (CWSIEC) for the 32 Landsat image acquisition dates during the 2011 (dry) and 2013 (wet) growing seasons. Results indicate that most SEB models can predict CWSI reasonably well. For example, the root mean square error (RMSE) ranged from 0.14 (SEBAL) to 0.29 (SSEBop) and the coefficient of determination (R-2) ranged from 0.25 (SSEBop) to 0.72 (SEBAL), justifying the added complexity in CWSI modeling as compared to results from the simple regression model (R-2 = 0.55, RMSE = 0.16). All SEB models underestimated CWSI in the dry year but the estimates from SEBAL and S-SEBI were within 7% of the mean CWSIEC and explained over 60% of variations in CWSIEC. In the wet year, S-SEBI mostly overestimated CWSI (around 28%), while estimates from METRIC, SEBAL, SEBS, and SSEBop were within 8% of the mean CWSIEC. Overall, SEBAL was the most robust model under all conditions followed by METRIC, whose performance was slightly worse and better than SEBAL in dry and wet years, respectively. Underestimation of CWSI under extremely dry soil conditions and the substantial role of SM in the regression model suggest that integration of SM in SEB models could improve their performances under dry conditions. These insights will provide useful guidance on the broader applicability of SEB models for mapping water stresses in switchgrass under varying geographical and meteorological conditions. (C) 2017 International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Inc. (ISPRS). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:尚未开发基于遥感的表面能平衡(SEB)模型跟踪雨养柳枝(Panicum virgatum L.)水分胁迫的能力。在本文中,利用Landsat衍生的蒸散量(ET),利用作物水分胁迫指数的理论框架(CWSI; 0 =极端潮湿或无水分胁迫条件,1 =极端干燥或无蒸腾条件)估算雨养柳枝switch的CWSI。 )的五个基于遥感的单源SEB模型,分别是土地表面能平衡算法(SEBAL),带有内部校准的制图ET(METRIC),表面能平衡系统(SEBS),简化表面能平衡指数(S-SEBI) ,以及简化的表面能平衡(SSEBop)。将来自五个SEB模型的CWSI估计值和使用归一化植被指数(NDVI),近地表温度差和测得的土壤湿度(SM)作为协变量的简单回归模型与由涡旋协方差测得的ET(CWSIEC)进行了比较在2011年(干旱)和2013年(潮湿)生长季节的32个Landsat图像采集日期中。结果表明,大多数SEB模型可以很好地预测CWSI。例如,均方根误差(RMSE)范围从0.14(SEBAL)到0.29(SSEBop),确定系数(R-2)范围从0.25(SSEBop)到0.72(SEBAL),证明CWSI增加了复杂性与简单回归模型的结果相比(R-2 = 0.55,RMSE = 0.16)。所有SEB模型在干旱年份都低估了CWSI,但SEBAL和S-SEBI的估计值在平均CWSIEC的7%之内,并解释了CWSIEC的60%以上的变化。在潮湿的一年中,S-SEBI主要高估了CWSI(大约28%),而METRIC,SEBAL,SEBS和SSEBop的估计值则在平均CWSIEC的8%之内。总体而言,SEBAL是所有条件下最强大的模型,其次是METRIC,在干燥和潮湿的年份,其性能分别比SEBAL稍差和更好。在极端干旱的土壤条件下对CWSI的低估以及SM在回归模型中的重要作用表明,将SM集成到SEB模型中可以改善其在干旱条件下的性能。这些见解将为SEB模型在不同地理和气象条件下绘制柳枝water中水分胁迫的更广泛适用性提供有用的指导。 (C)2017国际摄影测量与遥感学会(ISPRS)。由Elsevier B.V.发布。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号