...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Academic Ethics >Commercialism and Universities: An Ethical Analysis
【24h】

Commercialism and Universities: An Ethical Analysis

机译:商业主义与大学:伦理分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper questions the ethicality of commercial relationships between universities and external donors. By examining cases such as technology transfer and the outside funding of research interests, we identify possible conflicts of interest between the external provider of financial support and academic institutions. The reality today is that university administrators, who have significant decision-making powers, proactively seek large corporate sources of funding that may compromise academic values including academic freedom and the ability to make institutional decisions without the influence of commercial interests. For example, Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola have provided extensive funding to universities in return for exclusivity rights to market their product on campuses even though such products may not be healthy alternatives to other soft drinks. Pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies may have opposing interests to faculty and universities if the results of research do not meet the expectations of the sponsors. Curricula issues may be slanted to promote the interests of a corporation or other provider of outside funding. Corporate partnerships between universities and companies such as Nike raise ethical questions when students or other members of the campus community object to the acceptance of financial support from a company that allegedly practices anti-social labor practices in developing countries. On the other hand, corporate funding can be used to supplement diminishing financial resources available to academic institutions, especially for public universities. One benefit of external funding is that it supports pharmaceutical and technology-oriented research and development into new products and processes that have the potential to serve the public good. One cost of such funding arrangements is that the acceptance of financial support from commercial interests solely to market their products on campus restricts the choices available to students that should exist in a free market economy such as in the U.S. The ethicality of the relationship between universities and commercial interests is a matter of concern because of the potential influence of providers of external funds to universities that can compromise academic freedom and objective decision making.
机译:本文质疑大学与外部捐赠者之间商业关系的道德性。通过研究诸如技术转让和研究兴趣的外部资金之类的案例,我们确定了财务支持的外部提供者与学术机构之间可能存在的利益冲突。当今的现实是,拥有重大决策权的大学管理者会主动寻求大型公司资金来源,这些资金可能会损害学术价值,包括学术自由和在不受商业利益影响的情况下做出机构决策的能力。例如,可口可乐和百事可乐已向大学提供了大量资金,以换取其在校园内销售其产品的专有权,即使此类产品可能不是其他软饮料的健康替代品。如果研究结果不符合申办者的期望,那么制药和生物技术公司可能会对学院和大学有相反的利益。课程问题可以倾斜以促进公司或其他外部资金提供者的利益。当学生或校园社区的其他成员反对接受一家据称在发展中国家实行反社会劳动做法的公司的财务支持时,大学与耐克等公司之间的企业合作伙伴关系会引起道德问题。另一方面,公司资金可用于补充学术机构,尤其是公立大学可用的财政资源的减少。外部资金的好处之一是,它支持面向制药和技术的研究开发新产品和新工艺,这些新产品和新工艺有可能为公众利益服务。此类资助安排的成本之一是,仅出于商业利益接受在校园内销售其产品的商业支持,就限制了在美国等自由市场经济中应存在的学生的选择权。商业利益是一个令人关注的问题,因为外部资金提供者对大学的潜在影响可能会损害学术自由和客观决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号