...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Academic Ethics >Patients as Teaching Tools: Merely Informed or True Consent
【24h】

Patients as Teaching Tools: Merely Informed or True Consent

机译:患者作为教学工具:知情或真正同意

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Using patients as teaching tools raise many ethical issues like informed consent, privacy, confidentiality and beneficence. The current study highlights issues on respecting patient's choice and acquiring informed consent with its spirit rather than as mere formality. The study was conducted in out-patient department of The Kidney Center Postgraduate Training Institute Karachi Pakistan in May 2008 to July 2008. All patients who had come for the first time to see the author were included in the study. The said study explored the willingness of patients to allow medical students to be present during history taking and physical examination by the consultant. There were 18 male and 03 female patients. Age ranging from 22 to 73 years with mean age of 53.5± 13.7 years. There were total of 21 patient-students encounters out of which two encounters were with male students only and two with female students only. So in 17 Patient-students encounters, students of both genders were present. All patients permitted history taking in the presence of medical students except one who had a history of extramarital sexual contact and signs and symptoms suggestive of sexually transmitted disease. Of the male patients 50% (9/18) did not allow intimate examination before medical students. Out of these nine patients who refused, four consented earlier but when enquired again about their true willingness, they expressed their preference not to have medical students in the room while undergoing digital rectal and external genital examinations. Physicians need to develop sensitivity to acquire informed consent in its true essence rather than just as a formality by exploring actual willingness of the patient. One should refrain from being judgmental on the basis of gender, looks, religion or norms.
机译:将患者用作教学工具会引发许多道德问题,例如知情同意,隐私,保密和慈善。当前的研究突出了尊重患者选择并以其精神而非仅仅是形式获得知情同意的问题。该研究于2008年5月至2008年7月在巴基斯坦卡拉奇肾脏中心研究生训练学院的门诊进行。所有初次见到作者的患者均纳入研究。这项研究探索了患者愿意让医学生出席历史记录和顾问进行身体检查的意愿。男18例,女03例。年龄为22至73岁,平均年龄为53.5±13.7岁。总共有21次患者与学生的相遇,其中只有男性学生有2次,女性学生只有2次。因此,在17次患者与学生的相遇中,都出现了男女学生。所有患者均允许在医科学生在场的情况下进行病史检查,只有一名具有婚外性接触史以及暗示性传播疾病的体征和症状的患者。在男性患者中,有50%(9/18)不允许在医学生之前进行深入检查。在这9名拒绝的患者中,有4名较早同意,但是当再次询问他们的真实意愿时,他们表示他们希望在进行直肠指检和外生殖器检查时不让医学生进入房间。医生需要提高敏感性,以从本质上获得知情同意,而不仅仅是通过探索患者的实际意愿来获得形式同意。一个人应该避免基于性别,容貌,宗教或规范进行判断。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Academic Ethics》 |2009年第4期|P.255-260|共6页
  • 作者

    Syed Mamun Mahmud; Aasim Ahmad;

  • 作者单位

    The Kidney Centre Postgraduate Training Institute, 197/9 Rafique Shaheed Road, Karachi 75530, Pakistan;

    rnThe Kidney Centre Postgraduate Training Institute, 197/9 Rafique Shaheed Road, Karachi 75530, Pakistan Chairperson Bioethics Group, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    patients; teaching tool; informed consent;

    机译:耐心;教学工具;知情同意;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号