...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Academic Ethics >Ethics Issues with Private Research Ethics Boards: A Breakout Session at the 2009 NCEHR National Conference
【24h】

Ethics Issues with Private Research Ethics Boards: A Breakout Session at the 2009 NCEHR National Conference

机译:私人研究伦理委员会的伦理问题:2009 NCEHR全国会议的分组会议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Research Ethics Boards (REBs) provide oversight for Canadians that research projects will comply with standards of ethics if the studies are carried out as described in the documents that have been approved. While REBs have traditionally been affiliated with institutions such as universities and hospitals, a number of factors - including the increased volume of research being conducted outside academic centres - have resulted in the establishment of some private or independent REBs. This, in turn, has raised concerns about the credibility of REBs in the private sector and their capacity to handle issues around conflict of interest. This Breakout Session was an opportunity to hear the perspectives of people associated with institutional and private REBs and examine perceived problems with boards in the private sector, scrutinize theoretical and structural differences between types of REBs, and look at whether or not there is room for both institutional and private boards in the Canadian research review landscape.
机译:研究道德委员会(REB)对加拿大人进行监督,如果按照批准的文件中所述进行研究,则研究项目将符合道德标准。传统上,REB隶属于诸如大学和医院之类的机构,但许多因素(包括在学术中心以外进行的研究数量增加)导致建立了一些私人或独立的REB。反过来,这又引起了人们对私人机构可再生能源机构信誉的担忧,以及它们处理利益冲突问题的能力。这次分组讨论会提供了一个机会,可以听取与机构和私人REB相关人士的观点,并检查私人部门董事会中存在的问题,仔细研究REB类型之间的理论和结构差异,并了解两者是否有空间加拿大研究评论领域的机构和私人董事会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号