...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Genocide Research >Cleo's ‘unfinished business’: coming to terms with Dutch war crimes in Indonesia's war of independence
【24h】

Cleo's ‘unfinished business’: coming to terms with Dutch war crimes in Indonesia's war of independence

机译:Cleo的“未完成的业务”:在印尼独立战争中与荷兰战争罪行并存

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article discusses how Dutch society has come to terms with war crimes committed by its armed forces during the Indonesian/Dutch decolonization war (1945-49). In general, these ‘excesses’ have been legitimated by the community of veterans as the inevitable answer to provocative guerrilla tactics of the Indonesian adversary, who ‘forced’ Dutch troops to respond with harsh counter-insurgency measures. Although considerable evidence exists indicating that these measures led to violations of the laws of war, only a small percentage of these crimes were prosecuted at the time. Public references to them were rare until 1969, when the first disclosure on Dutch war crimes was broadcasted on television. From the late 1960s onwards, such charges would occasionally resurface in the media, causing brief upheaval in the veterans' community and the press. However, this did not bring about any major historical inquiry or legal repercussion on the Indonesian side. Only in 2011 did a group of Indonesian widows of executed resistance fighters file a lawsuit against the Dutch state. The present contribution describes and analyses how Dutch war veterans, media, historians and politicians have shaped the slow process of coming to terms with controversial aspects of the 1945-49 war. It offers a number of explanations that are related both to Dutch political culture and to the nature of the struggle.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2012.719374
机译:本文讨论了荷兰社会如何应对在印尼/荷兰非殖民化战争(1945-49)期间其武装部队犯下的战争罪行。总的来说,这些“过剩”被退伍军人社区视为印度尼西亚敌对挑衅性游击战术的必然答案,后者“强迫”荷兰军队采取严厉的反叛乱措施应对。尽管有大量证据表明这些措施导致违反战争法,但在当时仅起诉了这些犯罪的一小部分。直到1969年,电视上才播出了第一次有关荷兰战争罪的信息,直到那时才公开提及它们。从1960年代后期开始,此类指控偶尔会在媒体上浮出水面,在退伍军人社区和新闻界引起短暂的动荡。但是,这并没有引起印尼方面的任何重大历史询问或法律影响。仅在2011年,一群被处决的抵抗战士的印尼寡妇才对荷兰政府提起诉讼。本文稿描述并分析了荷兰退伍军人,媒体,历史学家和政治家如何塑造缓慢解决与1945-49年战争有争议的方面达成协议的过程。它提供了许多与荷兰政治文化和斗争性质有关的解释。查看全文下载全文相关变量add add_id ,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more“,发布编号:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2012.719374

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号