...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Genocide Research >Risk and resilience to mass atrocities in Africa: a comparison of Rwanda and Botswana
【24h】

Risk and resilience to mass atrocities in Africa: a comparison of Rwanda and Botswana

机译:非洲大规模暴行的风险和抵御能力:卢旺达和博茨瓦纳的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the 1980s, two nations in Africa stood out for their development and stability in a continent beset with famine, war and strife. Both Rwanda and Botswana earned the moniker ‘the Switzerland of Africa’ as they successfully pursued economic growth and development. But things went drastically wrong for Rwanda. In 1994, extremist elements led the most intense genocide of the twentieth century, resulting in the deaths of close to one million Tutsi and moderate Hutu in just a ninety-day period. The country was devastated and, seventeen years later, is still recovering. By contrast, Botswana has been able to maintain its strong economic growth and reputation as an oasis of stability. It has gone from one of the poorest countries in the world at its independence in 1966 to a solid middle-income nation. The presence of ethnic divisions and inequalities has not derailed Botswana's progress, which has occurred despite the presence of a number of the risk factors typically associated with nations fraught with ethnic strife. While Botswana has appeared on Genocide Watch's list of nations at risk of mass atrocities in the past, it was ranked relatively low on the scale, and has not experienced any major interethnic violence. The risk factors present in Botswana appear to have been offset by the nation's multiple strengths. This article seeks to compare risk and resilience in Rwanda and Botswana. While there has been extensive analysis of what ‘went wrong’ in Rwanda, there is much less information available about what ‘goes right’ in countries like Botswana. The case studies of these two nations suggest that understanding the pathways that lead to genocide and mass atrocities not only requires a consideration of risk, but a more complex analysis of the interaction between risk factors and mitigating factors that can have a protective function.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2011.606687
机译:在1980年代,非洲两个国家因其在饥荒,战争和冲突困扰的大陆上的发展与稳定而脱颖而出。卢旺达和博茨瓦纳都成功地追求了经济增长和发展,因此赢得了“非洲的瑞士”的美誉。但是对于卢旺达来说,事情彻底错了。 1994年,极端分子导致了20世纪最严重的种族灭绝,仅在90天之内就造成了近100万图西族和温和的胡图族死亡。该国被摧毁,十七年后仍在恢复。相比之下,博茨瓦纳已能够维持其强劲的经济增长和作为稳定绿洲的声誉。它已从1966年独立时世界上最贫穷的国家之一发展成为一个坚实的中等收入国家。种族分裂和不平等的存在并没有妨碍博茨瓦纳的进步,尽管存在许多通常与民族冲突缠身的国家有关的风险因素,但博茨瓦纳的进步仍在发生。过去,博茨瓦纳曾出现在《种族灭绝观察》中有可能发生大规模暴行的国家名单中,但在规模上排名较低,并且没有经历过任何重大的种族间暴力。博茨瓦纳存在的危险因素似乎已被该国的多重优势所抵消。本文旨在比较卢旺达和博茨瓦纳的风险和抵御能力。尽管已经对卢旺达的“不正确之处”进行了广泛的分析,但在像博茨瓦纳这样的国家中,有关“正确之处”的信息却很少。这两个国家的案例研究表明,了解导致种族灭绝和大规模暴行的途径不仅需要考虑风险,还需要对风险因素与具有保护作用的缓解因素之间的相互作用进行更复杂的分析。全文下载相关文章,请参见var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,service_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布日期:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”} ;添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2011.606687

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号