首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Science Education and Technology >The Effectiveness of Concept Maps in Teaching Physics Concepts Applied to Engineering Education: Experimental Comparison of the Amount of Learning Achieved With and Without Concept Maps
【24h】

The Effectiveness of Concept Maps in Teaching Physics Concepts Applied to Engineering Education: Experimental Comparison of the Amount of Learning Achieved With and Without Concept Maps

机译:概念图在物理概念教学中的有效性在工程教育中的应用:有和没有概念图的学习量的实验比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A study was conducted to quantify the effectiveness of concept maps in learning physics in engineering degrees. The following research question was posed: What was the difference in learning results from the use of concept maps to study a particular topic in an engineering course? The study design was quasi-experimental and used a post-test as a measuring instrument. The sample included 114 university students from the School of Industrial Engineering who were divided into two equivalent homogeneous groups of 57 students each. The amount of learning attained by the students in each group was compared, with the independent variable being the teaching method; the experimental group (E.G.) used concept maps, while the control group (C.G.) did not. We performed a crossover study with the two groups of students, with one group acting as the E.G. for the topic of optical fibers and as the C.G. for the topic of the fundamental particles of matter and vice versa for the other group. For each of the two topics studied, the evaluation instrument was a test of 100 dichotomous items. The resulting data were subjected to a comparative statistical analysis, which revealed a significant difference in the amount of learning attained by the E.G. students as compared with the C.G. students. The results allow us to state that for the use of concept maps, the average increment in the E.G. students' learning was greater than 19 percentage points.
机译:进行了一项研究,以量化概念图在工程学位学习物理学中的有效性。提出了以下研究问题:使用概念图来学习工程课程中的特定主题,学习结果有什么不同?研究设计是准实验性的,并使用后测试作为测量仪器。样本包括来自工业工程学院的114名大学生,他们被分为两组,每组57名学生。比较了各组学生的学习量,其中自变量为教学方法。实验组(E.G.)使用概念图,而对照组(C.G.)没有。我们与两组学生进行了交叉研究,其中一组作为E.G.用于光纤和C.G.对于物质的基本粒子这一主题,反之亦然。对于所研究的两个主题中的每一个,评估工具都是对100个二分项目的测试。对所得数据进行比较统计分析,结果表明E.G.所获得的学习量存在显着差异。学生与C.G.学生们。结果使我们能够说明,对于概念图的使用,E.G。学生的学习率大于19个百分点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号