...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >The Effect of Standard Strength vs. Contrast Strength Training on the Development of Sprint, Agility, Repeated Change of Direction, and Jump in Junior Male Soccer Players
【24h】

The Effect of Standard Strength vs. Contrast Strength Training on the Development of Sprint, Agility, Repeated Change of Direction, and Jump in Junior Male Soccer Players

机译:标准强度与对比度强度训练对冲刺,敏捷,反复改变方向发展的影响,以及初级男性足球运动员的跳跃

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Hammami, M, Negra, Y, Shephard, RJ, and Chelly, MS. The effect of standard strength vs. contrast strength training on the development of sprint, agility, repeated change of direction, and jump in junior male soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 31(4): 901-912, 2017The aim was to compare the impact of 2 differing strength training (ST) programs on the athletic performance of junior male soccer players at a critical phase during their competitive season. Participants aged 16.0 +/- 0.5 years were randomly assigned between control (C, n = 12), standard ST (n = 16), and contrast strength training (CST, n = 16), each performed twice a week. Athletic performance was assessed before and after the intervention using 8 tests: 40-m sprint, 4 x 5-m sprint (S4 x 5), 9-3-6-3-9 m sprint with 180 degrees turns (S180 degrees), 9-3-6-3-9 m sprint with backward and forward running (SBF), repeated shuttle sprint ability (RSSA), repeated change of direction (RCOD), squat jump (SJ), and countermovement jump (CMJ). The control group's (CG) performance tended to improve in some tests and decrease in others, but these changes were not statistically significant. Both training programs enhanced all sprint performances relative to controls (p 0.05). The strength training group (SG) and the CST group (CSG) increased significantly in S180 degrees, SBF, and S4 x 5 relative to CG, although the S4 x 5 also increased in CSG relative to SG (p 0.05). No intergroup difference of RSSA performance was observed. The RCOD parameters increased significantly in CSG relative to both SG and CG (p 0.05). The SJ and CMJ height increased significantly in both experimental groups (p < 0.000). We conclude that during the competitive season, some measures of athletic performance in male soccer players were increased more by 8 weeks of CST than by ST.
机译:哈马马文,M,Negra,Y,Shephard,RJ和Chelly,MS。标准强度与对比度强度训练对冲刺,敏捷,反复变化的发展的效果,以及初级男性足球运动员的跳跃。 J Right Cond Res 31(4):2017年901-912,2017目的是比较2个不同的力量训练(ST)计划对竞争赛季临界阶段的初级男性足球运动员运动表现的影响。在控制(C,N = 12),标准ST(N = 16)之间随机分配16.0 +/- 0.5年的参与者,以及对比度强度训练(CST,N = 16),每周两次进行两次。在使用8次测试之前和之后评估运动性能:40m次冲刺,4×5-m冲刺(S4 x 5),9-3-6-3-9 m,9-3-6-3-9 m旋转,具有180度的转弯(S180度), 9-3-6-3-9 m Sprint,向后和向前运行(SBF),重复穿梭Sprint能力(RSSA),反复变化方向(RCOD),Squat跳转(SJ)和对策跳转(CMJ)。控制组的(CG)性能趋于改善一些测试和减少其他测试,但这些变化没有统计学意义。培训计划都增强了相对于对照的所有冲刺性能(P 0.05)。强度训练组(SG)和CST组(CSG)相对于CG在S180度,SBF和S4 x 5中显着增加,尽管S4 x 5相对于SG也增加了CSG(P 0.05)。没有观察到RSSA性能的互动差异。相对于SG和CG(P 0.05),CSG中的RCOD参数显着增加。两种实验组的SJ和CMJ高度显着增加(P <0.000)。我们得出结论,在竞争季节,雄性足球运动员的运动表现的一些措施比ST的8周增加了8周。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号