...
首页> 外文期刊>Substance use & misuse >Street-level research on street-level interventions among drug users: Commentary on papers by Frank et al., Hayashi et al., Small et al., and Domanico and Malta
【24h】

Street-level research on street-level interventions among drug users: Commentary on papers by Frank et al., Hayashi et al., Small et al., and Domanico and Malta

机译:对吸毒者进行街头干预的街头研究:Frank等人,Hayashi等人,Small等人以及Domanico和马耳他对论文的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The research collected in these four papers does not form a single comparative study across multiple nations. Yet, reading these works together, one cannot help but notice a great consistency among the issues faced by each of the community-based initiatives supporting and protecting drug users even across such different social and political contexts. As well, there are clear trends in the relations between the organizations that emerge from these communities and the state and city agencies with which they most interact. For all of the differences in public health and criminal justice policies, these street-level organizations appear to be in the same boat, trying to address similar problems. What political processes, strategies, and constraints do these similarities reveal?
机译:这四篇论文中收集的研究并未形成跨多个国家的单一比较研究。然而,一起阅读这些著作,人们不禁会注意到,即使在这样不同的社会和政治背景下,支持和保护吸毒者的每一项基于社区的倡议也面临着很大的一致性。同样,在这些社区中出现的组织与它们之间最经常互动的州和城市机构之间的关系也有明显的趋势。由于公共卫生和刑事司法政策的所有差异,这些街头组织似乎在同一条船上,试图解决类似的问题。这些相似之处揭示了哪些政治过程,策略和限制条件?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号